Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Multicenter, Longitudinal, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study Describing Cognitive Processing Speed Changes in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Subjects Treated with Ozanimod (RPC-1063)

Research payments

$3,219,921

128 payments

Through program year 2025, $3,219,921 in research payments was reported against A Multicenter, Longitudinal, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study Describing Cognitive Processing Speed Changes in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Subjects Treated with Ozanimod (RPC-1063), across 128 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Celgene Corporation; E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $919,176 42
2024 Research $1,035,971 43
2023 Research $1,256,038 40
2022 Research $8,736 3

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Celgene Corporation $3,042,303 114 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $177,617 14 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Washington University School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $291,586 2 payments
  2. Advanced Neurosciences Institute Organisation paid for research $277,306 4 payments
  3. Neurology Center Of San Antonio Organisation paid for research $204,672 1 payment
  4. Lone Star Neuro Of San Antonio Organisation paid for research $190,917 2 payments
  5. Ms Living Well Organisation paid for research $153,153 3 payments
  6. Thomas Jefferson University Organisation paid for research $147,209 4 payments
  7. Georgetown University Organisation paid for research $133,504 4 payments
  8. University Of North Carolina Research Organisation paid for research $122,105 3 payments
  9. Washington University Organisation paid for research $108,811 3 payments
  10. Henry Ford Hospital Teaching hospital · MI $105,110 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record