Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Master Protocol to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3437943 Once Weekly in Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Obesity Or Overweight: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (Triumph-1)

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05929066

Research payments

$24,570,573

238 payments

Through program year 2025, $24,570,573 in research payments was reported against A Master Protocol to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3437943 Once Weekly in Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Obesity Or Overweight: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (Triumph-1), across 238 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Eli Lilly and Company; Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05929066

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $10,065,683 98
2024 Research $14,394,574 137
2023 Research $110,316 3

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $23,910,558 235 payments
  2. Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch $660,015 3 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Great Lakes Research Group INC Organisation paid for research $1,968,471 4 payments
  2. North Georgia Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $1,725,754 3 payments
  3. Artemis Headlands LLC Organisation paid for research $1,449,899 4 payments
  4. Suncoast Research Organisation paid for research $1,294,862 4 payments
  5. Tribe Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $1,272,175 8 payments
  6. Northwest Clinical Research Center Organisation paid for research $1,215,715 5 payments
  7. Studymetrix Research LLC Organisation paid for research $902,931 4 payments
  8. Juno Research LLC Organisation paid for research $882,558 4 payments
  9. Palm Research Center INC Organisation paid for research $854,179 4 payments
  10. Medvadis Research Corp LLC Organisation paid for research $849,396 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record