Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

1st replapse after len-containing regimen

Research payments

$159,985

18 payments

Through program year 2020, $159,985 in research payments was reported against 1st replapse after len-containing regimen, across 18 payments, paid by Amgen Inc..

Paid by
Amgen Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $159,985 18

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Amgen Inc. $159,985 18 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Oncology Hematology Care Incorporated Organisation paid for research $107,500 1 payment
  2. Texas Oncology- Tyler Organisation paid for research $8,240 2 payments
  3. Affiliated Oncologists, LLC Organisation paid for research $8,133 2 payments
  4. Baylor Charles A Sammons Cancer Center At Dallas Organisation paid for research $8,000 1 payment
  5. Texas Oncology - Austin Midtown Organisation paid for research $8,000 1 payment
  6. Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA Organisation paid for research $8,000 1 payment
  7. Texas Oncology, Fort Worth Organisation paid for research $8,000 1 payment
  8. Yale Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $1,591 1 payment
  9. University Of Alabama Hospital Teaching hospital · AL $1,034 1 payment
  10. Minnesota Onco Hemato PA Organisation paid for research $268 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record