Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

1Lm SCLC Tecentriq Lurbinectedin

Research payments

$2,219,453

353 payments

Through program year 2025, $2,219,453 in research payments was reported against 1Lm SCLC Tecentriq Lurbinectedin, across 353 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Genentech, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $373,740 75
2024 Research $549,910 73
2023 Research $660,250 114
2022 Research $632,419 89
2021 Research $3,135 2

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Genentech, Inc. $2,197,679 341 payments
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $21,773 12 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Cancer + Hematology Centers Of Western Michigan Organisation paid for research $398,822 29 payments
  2. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $239,429 36 payments
  3. Northwest Georgia Oncology Centers Pc Organisation paid for research $202,610 21 payments
  4. Mercy Research Organisation paid for research $102,156 20 payments
  5. Medical University Of South Carolina Teaching hospital · SC $99,486 9 payments
  6. Illinois Cancer Care Pc Oncology Hematology Assn Of Central Illinois Pc Organisation paid for research $98,121 25 payments
  7. Rhode Island Hospital Teaching hospital · RI $90,326 12 payments
  8. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Teaching hospital · MA $84,340 11 payments
  9. Cancer Care Northwest Centers PS Organisation paid for research $80,357 18 payments
  10. Illinois Cancer Care PC Organisation paid for research $79,267 24 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record