Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

VLP Mini-MOD

Device Extremities & Limb Restoration

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$223,292

164 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $223,292 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against VLP Mini-MOD (Extremities & Limb Restoration).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $223,292 164

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $223,292 164 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. William Ricci Orthopaedic Surgery · New York, NY $70,613 32% · 16 payments
  2. Paul Tornetta Orthopaedic Surgery · Boston, MA $58,631 26% · 16 payments
  3. Paul Cooper Foot and Ankle Surgery · Washington, DC $43,093 19% · 7 payments
  4. Steven Steinlauf Orthopaedic Surgery · Hollywood, FL $27,769 12% · 7 payments
  5. Thomas Zgonis Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery · San Antonio, TX $17,258 8% · 7 payments

The top 5 of 97 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery $159,544 71% · 25 practitioners
  2. Foot and Ankle Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $43,158 19% · 4 practitioners
  3. Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist $18,625 8% · 33 practitioners
  4. Hand Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $1,027 <1% · 15 practitioners
  5. Podiatrist $238 <1% · 8 practitioners

The top 5 of 12 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. New York $70,633 32% · 2 recipients
  2. Massachusetts $58,665 26% · 2 recipients
  3. District of Columbia $43,093 19% · 1 recipient
  4. Florida $28,771 13% · 23 recipients
  5. Texas $17,434 8% · 11 recipients

The top 5 of 23 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Records

164 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record