Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Visual-Ice

Device Interventional Oncology

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$102,282

393 payments

Research payments

$220,733

17 payments

Through program year 2020, $102,282 in general payments and $220,733 in research payments were reported against Visual-Ice (Interventional Oncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $168,000 2
2019 General $102,282 393
2019 Research $52,733 15

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Galil Medical Inc. $73,490 71 payments
  2. Biocompatibles, Inc. $16,015 317 payments
  3. Biocompatibles UK Ltd $12,743 4 payments
  4. BTG International, Inc. $34 1 payment
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Shamar Young Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Tucson, AZ $16,204 16% · 9 payments
  2. Robert Suh Diagnostic Radiology · Los Angeles, CA $12,689 12% · 9 payments
  3. Andrew Gunn Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Lexington, KY $10,028 10% · 6 payments
  4. John Park Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Duarte, CA $7,510 7% · 5 payments
  5. Sean Tutton Vascular & Interventional Radiology · San Diego, CA $7,128 7% · 1 payment

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Vascular & Interventional Radiology Radiology $71,111 70% · 114 practitioners
  2. Diagnostic Radiology Radiology $23,519 23% · 86 practitioners
  3. Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) $3,000 3% · 1 practitioner
  4. Urology $2,201 2% · 33 practitioners
  5. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $643 <1% · 2 practitioners

The top 5 of 13 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. California $24,722 24% · 57 recipients
  2. Minnesota $16,889 17% · 6 recipients
  3. Missouri $10,187 10% · 9 recipients
  4. Pennsylvania $8,023 8% · 8 recipients
  5. Florida $7,507 7% · 61 recipients

The top 5 of 34 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

393 general · 17 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record