Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Trek

Device Diagnostic Testing

PDI 00801741201370

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$47,178

1,033 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $47,178 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Trek (Diagnostic Testing).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $25,215 551
2024 General $17,224 385
2023 General $4,740 97

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. $41,329 865 payments
  2. Becton, Dickinson and Company $4,204 125 payments
  3. C. R. Bard, Inc. & Subsidiaries $1,041 11 payments
  4. Davol Inc. $604 32 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Luke Jenkins Physician Assistant · West Jordan, UT $1,772 7% · 13 payments
  2. Jenna Williams Nurse Practitioner · Chicago, IL $708 3% · 5 payments
  3. Meaghan Ryan Nurse Practitioner · Chicago, IL $708 3% · 5 payments
  4. Ana Foksha Nurse Practitioner, Family · Sacramento, CA $575 2% · 5 payments
  5. Niravkumar Brahmbhatt Internal Medicine · Columbia, MO $506 2% · 7 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Vascular & Interventional Radiology Radiology $6,898 27% · 118 practitioners
  2. Diagnostic Radiology Radiology $6,486 26% · 130 practitioners
  3. Physician Assistant $5,054 20% · 47 practitioners
  4. Nurse Practitioner $2,151 9% · 11 practitioners
  5. Physician Assistant, Medical Physician Assistant $1,244 5% · 12 practitioners

The top 5 of 29 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Texas $3,494 14% · 55 recipients
  2. Georgia $2,565 10% · 31 recipients
  3. Illinois $2,323 9% · 20 recipients
  4. New York $1,824 7% · 26 recipients
  5. Utah $1,815 7% · 2 recipients

The top 5 of 29 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

1,033 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record