Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Tigeretriever

Device Endovascular Therapy

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$52,486

7 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $52,486 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Tigeretriever (Endovascular Therapy).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $52,486 7

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Rapid Medical LTD $52,486 7 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Rishi Gupta Neurological Surgery · Marietta, GA $26,212 50% · 2 payments
  2. Jeffrey Saver Neurology · Los Angeles, CA $23,722 45% · 2 payments
  3. Ashutosh Jadhav Neurology · Scottsdale, AZ $1,555 3% · 1 payment
  4. Dileep Yavagal Neurology · Miami, FL $774 1% · 1 payment
  5. Erez Nossek Neurological Surgery · New York, NY $223 <1% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Neurological Surgery $26,435 50% · 2 practitioners
  2. Neurology Psychiatry & Neurology $26,051 50% · 3 practitioners

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Georgia $26,212 50% · 1 recipient
  2. California $23,722 45% · 1 recipient
  3. Pennsylvania $1,555 3% · 1 recipient
  4. Florida $774 1% · 1 recipient
  5. New York $223 <1% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

7 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record