Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Sti

Device Diagnostics

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$52

3 payments

Research payments

$316,732

2 payments

Through program year 2020, $52 in general payments and $316,732 in research payments were reported against Sti (Diagnostics).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $52 3
2019 Research $316,732 2

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Hologic, LLC $52 3 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. Maria Theresa Villa Family Medicine · San Diego, CA $18 35% · 1 payment
  2. Michael Thesing Obstetrics · National City, CA $18 35% · 1 payment
  3. John Feeney Adult Medicine · Murrieta, CA $16 31% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Family Medicine $18 35% · 1 practitioner
  2. Obstetrics Obstetrics & Gynecology $18 35% · 1 practitioner
  3. Adult Medicine Family Medicine $16 31% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. California $34 65% · 2 recipients
  2. Ohio $18 35% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

3 general · 2 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record