Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Sequoia Posterior Spinal System

Device Spine

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,958

9 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2020, $6,958 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Sequoia Posterior Spinal System (Spine).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $2,652 5
2019 General $4,305 4

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. $6,958 9 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. George McBride Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Orlando, FL $2,635 99% · 4 payments
  2. Daniel Yanni Neurological Surgery · Newport Beach, CA $17 <1% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine Orthopaedic Surgery $2,635 99% · 1 practitioner
  2. Neurological Surgery $17 <1% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. Florida $2,635 99% · 1 recipient
  2. California $17 <1% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

9 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record