Product Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ruxience

Biological Oncology

NDC 0069-0238-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$127,729

3,235 payments

Research payments

$468,998

6 payments

Through program year 2023, $127,729 in general payments and $468,998 in research payments were reported against Ruxience (Oncology).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 General $373 23
2023 Research $35,837 1
2022 General $13,058 581
2021 General $55,473 1,656
2021 Research $322,535 2
2020 General $58,336 924
2020 Research $110,626 3
2019 General $490 51

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Pfizer Inc. $119,319 3,228 payments
  2. Pfizer International LLC $8,348 2 payments
  3. Array BioPharma Inc. $63 5 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2023
  1. Kin Lam Internal Medicine · New York, NY $32 9% · 2 payments
  2. Zhao Lu Hematology & Oncology · Milford, CT $30 8% · 2 payments
  3. Paul Bader Hematology & Oncology · Rego Park, NY $25 7% · 1 payment
  4. Jeffrey Ambinder Hematology & Oncology · Yorktown Heights, NY $24 6% · 1 payment
  5. Howard Zipin Hematology & Oncology · Sellersville, PA $21 6% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 21 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2023
  1. Hematology & Oncology Internal Medicine $216 58% · 11 practitioners
  2. Nurse Practitioner, Family Nurse Practitioner $38 10% · 3 practitioners
  3. Internal Medicine $32 9% · 1 practitioner
  4. Nurse Practitioner, Adult Health Nurse Practitioner $29 8% · 2 practitioners
  5. Nurse Practitioner $26 7% · 2 practitioners

The top 5 of 7 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2023. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2023
  1. New York $199 53% · 10 recipients
  2. Connecticut $58 16% · 3 recipients
  3. New Jersey $48 13% · 3 recipients
  4. Indiana $26 7% · 2 recipients
  5. Pennsylvania $21 6% · 1 recipient

The top 5 of 6 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Prescribed to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024

Part D claims

1,184

Prescriptions dispensed, refills included

Drug cost

$7,806,572

Paid at the pharmacy, in all

Prescribers

65

With 11 or more claims of it

Medicare Part D drugs matched to RUXIENCE, 2024
Part D drug Name match Relative to the largest Prescribers Claims Drug cost
Ruxience Rituximab-Pvvr Same name 65 1,184 $7,806,572

Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.

Largest prescribers

First 5 of 65 by claims · 2024

Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

The prescribers with the most Part D claims of this drug in 2024
Prescriber Specialty State Claims Drug cost Related payments
Sejal Vaidya Nurse Practitioner MD 86 $468,577 None on record
Pratibha Desai Hematology-Oncology FL 35 $213,693 None on record
Brian Choi Hematology-Oncology CA 34 $129,115 None on record
Zili He Hematology-Oncology NY 32 $138,729 None on record
Elvin Garcia Rheumatology TX 31 $418,306 None on record

"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 65 with Patron

Given in the clinic

Part B · billing code
Medicare Part B billing codes matched to RUXIENCE
Billing code Providers Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, rituximab-pvvr, biosimilar, (ruxience), 10 mg Q5119 133 355,143 $5,663,101

Drugs given by a clinician are billed to Medicare Part B, not Part D. The product is tied to a billing code through the NDC on CMS's crosswalk, which was published for a later quarter than the payments, so a code that changed in between can be missed. Providers with fewer than 11 patients for the code are not published. Medicare's payment here is what it paid for the services, to the billing practice.

3,235 general · 6 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record