Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Reliance 4 Front

Device Therapies

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,273

349 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $8,273 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Reliance 4 Front (Therapies).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $8,273 349

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $8,273 349 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Bradley Knight Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $163 2% · 4 payments
  2. Nishant Verma Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $156 2% · 2 payments
  3. Ihsan Haque Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Barberton, OH $153 2% · 1 payment
  4. Rishi Arora Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $150 2% · 1 payment
  5. Albert Lin Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $150 2% · 1 payment

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $4,618 56% · 121 practitioners
  2. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $2,301 28% · 79 practitioners
  3. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $772 9% · 38 practitioners
  4. Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Internal Medicine $150 2% · 1 practitioner
  5. Internal Medicine $106 1% · 5 practitioners

The top 5 of 16 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Illinois $2,357 28% · 22 recipients
  2. California $1,026 12% · 26 recipients
  3. Texas $550 7% · 31 recipients
  4. South Carolina $357 4% · 16 recipients
  5. New York $318 4% · 17 recipients

The top 5 of 35 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

349 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record