Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Protek Duo

Device Cardiology/Vascular Diseases

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,201

144 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $6,201 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Protek Duo (Cardiology/Vascular Diseases).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $6,201 144

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. LivaNova USA, Inc. $6,201 144 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Jose Garcia Transplant Surgery · Hollywood, FL $795 13% · 20 payments
  2. Anthony Smeglin Interventional Cardiology · Cherry Hill, NJ $193 3% · 4 payments
  3. Arthur Martella Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) · Rochester, NY $193 3% · 4 payments
  4. Hans Bauer Interventional Cardiology · Cherry Hill, NJ $188 3% · 3 payments
  5. Timothy Morris Interventional Cardiology · Sewell, NJ $182 3% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 96 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $1,960 32% · 26 practitioners
  2. Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) $1,938 31% · 33 practitioners
  3. Transplant Surgery $795 13% · 1 practitioner
  4. Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology Internal Medicine $578 9% · 11 practitioners
  5. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $562 9% · 8 practitioners

The top 5 of 15 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Indiana $1,432 23% · 7 recipients
  2. New Jersey $1,301 21% · 7 recipients
  3. Pennsylvania $757 12% · 9 recipients
  4. Texas $569 9% · 14 recipients
  5. Illinois $331 5% · 6 recipients

The top 5 of 21 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

144 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record