Who Paid My Doc
Procysbi
Drug Procysbi
NDC 49663-001-06
General payments
$1,048,202
Research payments
$94,127
Through program year 2023, $1,048,202 in general payments and $94,127 in research payments were reported against Procysbi (Procysbi).
No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
By program year
7 rows| Year | Kind | Amount | Payments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | General | $242,389 | 334 |
| 2022 | General | $242,684 | 325 |
| 2021 | General | $214,599 | 157 |
| 2020 | General | $160,141 | 111 |
| 2020 | Research | $53,734 | 1 |
| 2019 | General | $188,389 | 237 |
| 2019 | Research | $40,393 | 1 |
Breakdown
The top 5 of 85 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023.
The top 5 of 14 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2023. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.
The top 5 of 25 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2023 where a state was reported.
Prescribed to Medicare patients
Part D · data year 2024Part D claims
279
Drug cost
$19,633,999
Prescribers
16
| Part D drug | Name match | Relative to the largest | Prescribers | Claims | Drug cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procysbi Cysteamine Bitartrate | Same name | 16 | 279 | $19,633,999 |
Matched to this product by name; CMS does not link its files to Open Payments, so a similar name can be a different strength, form or brand. Prescriber counts include only prescribers with 11 or more claims of the drug, because CMS publishes nothing below that. Part D covers drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries at a pharmacy; it does not include drugs given in a clinic or hospital, or patients with other insurance.
Largest prescribers
First 5 of 16 by claims · 2024Two separate records. Claims come from Medicare and related payments from Open Payments. They are shown in one row because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.
| Prescriber | Specialty | State | Claims | Drug cost | Related payments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurence Greenbaum | Pediatric Medicine | GA | 44 | $3,672,620 | None on record |
| Brent Miller | Nephrology | IN | 28 | $1,859,099 | None on record |
| Timothy Curley | Nephrology | VA | 26 | $1,648,167 | $25 |
| Jignesh Shah | Nephrology | MO | 24 | $172,909 | None on record |
| Paul Grimm | Nephrology | CA | 22 | $1,983,536 | $16,401 |
"No profile" means the prescriber has no Open Payments record here; "None on record" means no payment naming this product in the payment year. Related payments are general payments, and one that names several products is split evenly, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it. The list is the prescribers with the most claims, up to 100 per drug.
See all 16 in the dashboard with a free accountRecords
1,164 general · 2 researchEvery payment, record by record
Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.
What you are looking at
Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.