Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Procleix Babesia Panther

Device Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$457

14 payments

Research payments

$17,065

5 payments

Through program year 2019, $457 in general payments and $17,065 in research payments were reported against Procleix Babesia Panther (Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $457 14
2019 Research $17,065 5

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Grifols Diagnostic Solutions, Inc. $457 14 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Philip Norris Internal Medicine · San Francisco, CA $42 9% · 1 payment
  2. Susan Rossmann Blood Banking & Transfusion Medicine · Houston, TX $32 7% · 1 payment
  3. Eric Senaldi Blood Banking & Transfusion Medicine · Hackensack, NJ $32 7% · 1 payment
  4. John Lavelle Family Medicine · Farmers Branch, TX $32 7% · 1 payment
  5. Rakesh Abbi Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology · White Plains, NY $32 7% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 14 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Anatomic Pathology & Clinical Pathology Pathology $162 35% · 5 practitioners
  2. Blood Banking & Transfusion Medicine Pathology $156 34% · 5 practitioners
  3. Clinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine Pathology $65 14% · 2 practitioners
  4. Internal Medicine $42 9% · 1 practitioner
  5. Family Medicine $32 7% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. California $236 52% · 7 recipients
  2. New York $97 21% · 3 recipients
  3. Texas $65 14% · 2 recipients
  4. New Jersey $32 7% · 1 recipient
  5. Pennsylvania $26 6% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

14 general · 5 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record