Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Device Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$385,409

3,155 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $385,409 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $385,409 3,155

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $385,409 3,155 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Ravi Bashyal Orthopaedic Surgery · Skokie, IL $65,981 17% · 77 payments
  2. David Zabel Plastic Surgery · Augusta, GA $32,332 8% · 40 payments
  3. Kenneth Moquin Plastic Surgery · Detroit, MI $25,899 7% · 50 payments
  4. Hardayal Singh Orthopaedic Surgery · Rocky Mount, NC $23,063 6% · 53 payments
  5. Ronald Singer Orthopaedic Surgery · Charlotte, NC $21,420 6% · 40 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery $134,835 36% · 347 practitioners
  2. Plastic Surgery $94,228 25% · 74 practitioners
  3. Surgery $49,583 13% · 309 practitioners
  4. Family Medicine $16,585 4% · 47 practitioners
  5. Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery Podiatrist $16,264 4% · 127 practitioners

The top 5 of 79 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Missouri $87,593 23% · 73 recipients
  2. North Carolina $45,817 12% · 45 recipients
  3. Delaware $32,761 9% · 8 recipients
  4. Michigan $28,393 7% · 64 recipients
  5. Florida $26,456 7% · 153 recipients

The top 5 of 49 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

3,155 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record