Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Pico 7

Device Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

PDI 05000223492175

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,088,183

8,182 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,088,183 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Pico 7 (Negative Pressure Wound Therapy).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $213,231 1,580
2024 General $637,114 1,547
2023 General $117,275 2,331
2022 General $120,550 2,723
2021 General $13 1

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $1,088,183 8,182 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Ravi Bashyal Orthopaedic Surgery · Skokie, IL $86,818 41% · 19 payments
  2. Javad Parvizi Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery · Philadelphia, PA $28,519 13% · 4 payments
  3. V Reddy Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) · Nashville, TN $18,199 9% · 6 payments
  4. Robert Galiano Plastic Surgery · Chicago, IL $10,721 5% · 5 payments
  5. Susan Khalil Gynecology · Staten Island, NY $6,628 3% · 3 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery $93,060 44% · 160 practitioners
  2. Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $29,770 14% · 25 practitioners
  3. Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) $18,981 9% · 24 practitioners
  4. Obstetrics & Gynecology $15,867 8% · 265 practitioners
  5. Plastic Surgery $11,529 5% · 17 practitioners

The top 5 of 73 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Illinois $98,960 46% · 60 recipients
  2. Pennsylvania $35,107 16% · 107 recipients
  3. Tennessee $18,484 9% · 15 recipients
  4. Michigan $13,022 6% · 141 recipients
  5. New York $11,882 6% · 88 recipients

The top 5 of 42 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

8,182 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record