Product Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Patient-Fitted TMJ Reconstructive Prosthesis System

Device Craniomaxillofacial

PDI B0046001300

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$441,333

227 payments

Research payments

$27,690

1 payment

Through program year 2022, $441,333 in general payments and $27,690 in research payments were reported against Patient-Fitted TMJ Reconstructive Prosthesis System (Craniomaxillofacial).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 General $159,857 124
2022 Research $27,690 1
2021 General $281,475 103

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. Stryker Corporation $441,333 227 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2022
  1. Gary Warburton Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery · Baltimore, MD $38,504 24% · 16 payments
  2. Vikram Durairaj Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · Austin, TX $28,525 18% · 13 payments
  3. Louis Mercuri Dentist, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · Maywood, IL $15,575 10% · 11 payments
  4. Keith Blackwell Otolaryngology · Los Angeles, CA $13,556 8% · 2 payments
  5. Nigel Matthews Dentist, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · Chapel Hill, NC $12,250 8% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 72 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2022.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2022
  1. Dentist, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Dentist $40,444 27% · 15 practitioners
  2. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery $40,130 27% · 4 practitioners
  3. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Ophthalmology $28,525 19% · 1 practitioner
  4. Otolaryngology $14,623 10% · 19 practitioners
  5. Neurological Surgery $11,020 7% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 14 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2022. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2022
  1. Maryland $38,504 24% · 1 recipient
  2. Texas $29,289 18% · 3 recipients
  3. California $26,044 16% · 13 recipients
  4. Pennsylvania $20,158 13% · 2 recipients
  5. Illinois $15,575 10% · 1 recipient

The top 5 of 16 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2022 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

227 general · 1 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record