Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Nim-Response

Device Nerve Monitoring Products

PDI 00643169782549

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$105,540

228 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $105,540 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Nim-Response (Nerve Monitoring Products).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $9,104 62
2024 General $75,507 79
2023 General $10,424 32
2022 General $10,505 55

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Medtronic, Inc. $105,540 228 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Gregory Randolph Otolaryngology · Boston, MA $2,560 28% · 1 payment
  2. Ralph Tufano Otolaryngology · Sarasota, FL $1,535 17% · 2 payments
  3. Julia Noel Otolaryngology · Palo Alto, CA $1,250 14% · 2 payments
  4. Michael Singer Otolaryngology · Brooklyn, NY $1,080 12% · 1 payment
  5. Jeffrey Janus Otolaryngology · Jacksonville, FL $450 5% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 60 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Otolaryngology $7,815 88% · 25 practitioners
  2. Anesthesiology $334 4% · 12 practitioners
  3. Otolaryngology/Facial Plastic Surgery Otolaryngology $130 1% · 2 practitioners
  4. Physician Assistant, Medical Physician Assistant $115 1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Nurse Anesthetist, Certified Registered $62 <1% · 3 practitioners

The top 5 of 15 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Massachusetts $2,560 28% · 1 recipient
  2. Maryland $1,578 17% · 2 recipients
  3. Michigan $1,279 14% · 7 recipients
  4. California $1,278 14% · 2 recipients
  5. Florida $972 11% · 17 recipients

The top 5 of 18 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

228 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record