Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Neo Pedicle Screw System

Device Spinal Surgery

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$852,112

650 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $852,112 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Neo Pedicle Screw System (Spinal Surgery).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $257,873 187
2024 General $184,539 95
2023 General $175,855 114
2022 General $124,518 89
2021 General $17,073 50
2020 General $27,686 39
2019 General $64,568 76

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Neo Spine USA Inc $852,112 650 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Vivek Mehta Neurological Surgery · Los Angeles, CA $82,038 32% · 10 payments
  2. Ali Mesiwala Neurological Surgery · Rancho Cucamonga, CA $48,022 19% · 7 payments
  3. Joseph Ciacci Neurological Surgery · San Diego, CA $31,736 12% · 10 payments
  4. Robert Eastlack Orthopaedic Surgery · La Jolla, CA $26,114 10% · 6 payments
  5. Steven Spitz Neurological Surgery · Canton, GA $17,828 7% · 7 payments

The top 5 of 71 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Neurological Surgery $210,546 82% · 30 practitioners
  2. Orthopaedic Surgery $28,369 11% · 14 practitioners
  3. Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine Orthopaedic Surgery $17,962 7% · 23 practitioners
  4. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation $330 <1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Hospitalist $330 <1% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 7 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $229,075 89% · 35 recipients
  2. Georgia $19,757 8% · 8 recipients
  3. New York $2,133 <1% · 6 recipients
  4. Texas $2,116 <1% · 2 recipients
  5. Nebraska $1,846 <1% · 6 recipients

The top 5 of 14 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

650 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record