Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Mammomat Revelation

Device DI - X-Ray Products

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$118,129

783 payments

Research payments

$21,540

4 payments

Through program year 2020, $118,129 in general payments and $21,540 in research payments were reported against Mammomat Revelation (DI - X-Ray Products).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $57,672 299
2020 Research $21,540 4
2019 General $60,458 484

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. $118,129 783 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. Brandie Fagin Diagnostic Radiology · Chicago, IL $21,548 37% · 10 payments
  2. Jennifer Doe Diagnostic Radiology · Houston, TX $4,300 7% · 8 payments
  3. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $4,200 7% · 2 payments
  4. Rachel Brem Diagnostic Radiology · Washington, DC $4,000 7% · 1 payment
  5. Thomas Helling Diagnostic Radiology · Topeka, KS $3,404 6% · 4 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Diagnostic Radiology Radiology $49,419 99% · 129 practitioners
  2. Vascular & Interventional Radiology Radiology $214 <1% · 5 practitioners
  3. Surgery $44 <1% · 1 practitioner
  4. Family Medicine $43 <1% · 2 practitioners
  5. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $29 <1% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 8 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. Massachusetts $21,548 37% · 1 recipient
  2. Texas $8,745 15% · 38 recipients
  3. Ohio $4,501 8% · 4 recipients
  4. District of Columbia $4,000 7% · 1 recipient
  5. Kansas $3,404 6% · 1 recipient

The top 5 of 35 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

783 general · 4 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record