Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

IOLMaster 700

Device Optical Biometer

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$435,561

188 payments

Research payments

$5,000

1 payment

Through program year 2019, $435,561 in general payments and $5,000 in research payments were reported against IOLMaster 700 (Optical Biometer).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $435,561 188
2019 Research $5,000 1

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $293,141 175 payments
  2. Carl Zeiss Meditec AG $137,145 9 payments
  3. Carl Zeiss Meditec Digital Innovations LLC $5,275 4 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Jack Holladay Bellaire, TX $112,675 26% · 12 payments
  2. Robert Osher Ophthalmology · Cincinnati, OH $62,566 14% · 7 payments
  3. Kerry Solomon Ophthalmology · Mt Pleasant, SC $44,896 10% · 12 payments
  4. Kenneth Hoffer Ophthalmology · Santa Monica, CA $29,745 7% · 1 payment
  5. Elizabeth Yeu-Lin Ophthalmology · Norfolk, VA $18,275 4% · 7 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Ophthalmology $300,256 97% · 91 practitioners
  2. Glaucoma Specialist Ophthalmology $5,639 2% · 4 practitioners
  3. Retina Specialist Ophthalmology $1,650 <1% · 1 practitioner
  4. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Ophthalmology $1,200 <1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Cornea and External Diseases Specialist Ophthalmology $600 <1% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 6 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Texas $144,118 33% · 11 recipients
  2. Ohio $63,329 15% · 4 recipients
  3. California $60,351 14% · 15 recipients
  4. South Carolina $44,945 10% · 2 recipients
  5. Virginia $18,338 4% · 3 recipients

The top 5 of 32 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

188 general · 1 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record