Product Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ingevity

Device Brady

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,048

544 payments

Research payments

$98,053

82 payments

Through program year 2021, $19,048 in general payments and $98,053 in research payments were reported against Ingevity (Brady).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 General $46 3
2020 General $4,576 310
2020 Research $20,121 14
2019 General $14,427 231
2019 Research $77,932 68

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $19,048 544 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2021
  1. Eric Black-Maier Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Atlanta, GA $37 81% · 2 payments
  2. Michael Rehorn Internal Medicine · Boston, MA $9 19% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2021.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2021
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $37 81% · 1 practitioner
  2. Internal Medicine $9 19% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2021. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2021
  1. North Carolina $46 100% · 2 recipients

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2021 where a state was reported.

544 general · 82 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record