Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

FebriDx

Device In vitro diagnostic

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$28,890

4 payments

Research payments

$370,615

20 payments

Through program year 2025, $28,890 in general payments and $370,615 in research payments were reported against FebriDx (In vitro diagnostic).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $24,950 2
2025 Research $356,015 19
2024 General $3,940 2
2024 Research $14,600 1

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Lumos Diagnostics, Inc. $28,890 4 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Lee Resnick Family Medicine · Beachwood, OH $19,200 77% · 1 payment
  2. Nathan Shapiro Emergency Medicine · Boston, MA $5,750 23% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Family Medicine $19,200 77% · 1 practitioner
  2. Emergency Medicine $5,750 23% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Ohio $19,200 77% · 1 recipient
  2. Massachusetts $5,750 23% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

4 general · 20 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record