Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Esperoct

Biological Hemophilia

NDC 0169-8500-01

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$534,301

628 payments

Research payments

$1,891,105

665 payments

Through program year 2025, $534,301 in general payments and $1,891,105 in research payments were reported against Esperoct (Hemophilia).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

11 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $175 10
2024 General $116,879 151
2024 Research $197,104 7
2023 General $63,515 62
2023 Research $649,936 10
2022 General $115,715 151
2022 Research $154,007 53
2021 General $76,906 116
2021 Research $403,293 178
2020 General $161,111 138
2020 Research $486,765 417

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $518,576 618 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Health Care AG $15,725 10 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Fiona Crozier Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Austin, TX $24 13% · 1 payment
  2. Mustafa Moazam Internal Medicine · El Paso, TX $21 12% · 1 payment
  3. Grace Esparza Physician Assistant · El Paso, TX $21 12% · 1 payment
  4. Kathleen Lukasik Physician Assistant · Apex, NC $17 10% · 1 payment
  5. Samreen Azeem Family Medicine · Holly Springs, NC $17 10% · 1 payment

The top 5 of 10 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Physician Assistant $39 22% · 2 practitioners
  2. Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Nurse Practitioner $37 21% · 2 practitioners
  3. Internal Medicine $21 12% · 1 practitioner
  4. Family Medicine $17 10% · 1 practitioner
  5. Sleep Medicine Otolaryngology $16 9% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 8 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Texas $83 47% · 4 recipients
  2. Connecticut $41 24% · 3 recipients
  3. North Carolina $35 20% · 2 recipients
  4. California $16 9% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

628 general · 665 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record