Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Erectile Dysfunction

Device Ams

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$14,086

200 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $14,086 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Erectile Dysfunction (Ams).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $14,086 200

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $14,086 200 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Justin Houman Urology · Los Angeles, CA $3,319 24% · 42 payments
  2. Melissa Mendez Urology · Silver Spring, MD $2,196 16% · 20 payments
  3. Theodore Saitz Urology · Nellis Afb, NV $1,618 11% · 10 payments
  4. Thomas Masterson Urology · Miami, FL $1,514 11% · 26 payments
  5. Caitlin Lim Urology · Santa Cruz, CA $1,036 7% · 10 payments

The top 5 of 26 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Urology $14,086 100% · 26 practitioners

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Florida $5,602 40% · 6 recipients
  2. California $3,431 24% · 2 recipients
  3. Pennsylvania $1,073 8% · 2 recipients
  4. Indiana $985 7% · 1 recipient
  5. Iowa $707 5% · 1 recipient

The top 5 of 17 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

200 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record