Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

EnSite Velocity System Mapping D

Device Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,327

150 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $18,327 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against EnSite Velocity System Mapping D (Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $18,327 150

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Abbott Laboratories $18,327 150 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. Miguel Abreu Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · San Juan, PR $935 5% · 2 payments
  2. Amir Chaudhari Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Waukesha, WI $856 5% · 7 payments
  3. Jalaj Garg Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Loma Linda, CA $856 5% · 7 payments
  4. Helder Hernandez Rivera Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Ponce, PR $819 4% · 2 payments
  5. Sumeet Mainigi Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Philadelphia, PA $771 4% · 6 payments

The top 5 of 52 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $16,449 90% · 41 practitioners
  2. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $1,079 6% · 5 practitioners
  3. Pediatric Cardiology Pediatrics $432 2% · 4 practitioners
  4. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $283 2% · 1 practitioner
  5. Internal Medicine $84 <1% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Pennsylvania $3,641 20% · 8 recipients
  2. Ohio $2,692 15% · 11 recipients
  3. Puerto Rico $1,754 10% · 2 recipients
  4. New York $1,443 8% · 3 recipients
  5. Kentucky $1,300 7% · 3 recipients

The top 5 of 24 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Records

150 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record