Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Dyna-Link TI

Device Spinal Surgery

PDI 00190837143039

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$129,365

111 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $129,365 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Dyna-Link TI (Spinal Surgery).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $79,402 59
2024 General $30,997 20
2023 General $18,966 32

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Life Spine, Inc. $129,365 111 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Ali Mesiwala Neurological Surgery · Rancho Cucamonga, CA $68,857 87% · 6 payments
  2. Mohammad Khan Neurological Surgery · New Lenox, IL $6,695 8% · 12 payments
  3. Charles Gordon Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine · Daphne, AL $1,597 2% · 16 payments
  4. Kristy Barrentine Nurse Practitioner, Critical Care Medicine · Daphne, AL $1,453 2% · 12 payments
  5. Brandon Chew Neurological Surgery · Monroeville, PA $470 <1% · 7 payments

The top 5 of 11 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Neurological Surgery $76,163 96% · 6 practitioners
  2. Orthopaedic Surgery of the Spine Orthopaedic Surgery $1,633 2% · 2 practitioners
  3. Nurse Practitioner, Critical Care Medicine Nurse Practitioner $1,453 2% · 1 practitioner
  4. Physician Assistant, Surgical Physician Assistant $91 <1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Orthopaedic Surgery $62 <1% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $68,857 87% · 1 recipient
  2. Illinois $6,877 9% · 3 recipients
  3. Alabama $3,050 4% · 2 recipients
  4. Pennsylvania $470 <1% · 1 recipient
  5. Texas $148 <1% · 4 recipients

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

111 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record