Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing

Device Recon Hips

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$183,250

131 payments

Research payments

$113,505

46 payments

Through program year 2019, $183,250 in general payments and $113,505 in research payments were reported against Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (Recon Hips).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $183,250 131
2019 Research $113,505 46

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $183,250 131 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. William Lutes Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery · Kenosha, WI $21,341 12% · 5 payments
  2. Peter Brooks Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery · Vero Beach, FL $19,493 11% · 19 payments
  3. Robert Kennon Orthopaedic Surgery · Middlebury, CT $15,840 9% · 5 payments
  4. Reid Brown Orthopaedic Surgery · Louisville, KY $13,838 8% · 1 payment
  5. Ritesh Shah Orthopaedic Surgery · Morton Grove, IL $12,652 7% · 5 payments

The top 5 of 42 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery $111,480 62% · 25 practitioners
  2. Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $58,177 32% · 9 practitioners
  3. Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgery $7,330 4% · 2 practitioners
  4. Anesthesiology $1,620 <1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $546 <1% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Ohio $21,993 12% · 2 recipients
  2. Wisconsin $21,341 12% · 1 recipient
  3. Connecticut $20,820 11% · 2 recipients
  4. Florida $19,199 10% · 2 recipients
  5. Illinois $17,583 10% · 5 recipients

The top 5 of 21 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

Records

131 general · 46 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record