Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Balanced Knee Revision System

Device orthopedic device

PDI 00822409037643

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$1,589,115

354 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,589,115 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Balanced Knee Revision System (orthopedic device).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $753,704 68
2024 General $798,308 132
2023 General $11,583 46
2022 General $14,008 46
2021 General $11,512 62

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Ortho Development Corporation $1,589,115 354 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Nathan Momberger Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery · Murray, UT $566,553 75% · 12 payments
  2. Joshua Hickman Orthopaedic Surgery · Bountiful, UT $99,198 13% · 11 payments
  3. Cass Nakasone Orthopaedic Surgery · Honolulu, HI $44,914 6% · 11 payments
  4. Michael Hoffman Orthopaedic Surgery · Brigham City, UT $37,536 5% · 12 payments
  5. Jeffrey Frandsen Orthopaedic Surgery · Charlotte, NC $3,192 <1% · 2 payments

The top 5 of 22 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Adult Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $566,666 75% · 2 practitioners
  2. Orthopaedic Surgery $186,717 25% · 17 practitioners
  3. Physician Assistant $111 <1% · 1 practitioner
  4. Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine, Sports Medicine $111 <1% · 1 practitioner
  5. Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgery $100 <1% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. Utah $703,287 93% · 3 recipients
  2. Hawaii $44,914 6% · 1 recipient
  3. Montana $3,192 <1% · 1 recipient
  4. Alabama $893 <1% · 6 recipients
  5. Massachusetts $519 <1% · 2 recipients

The top 5 of 10 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

354 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record