Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Azur CX Detachable

Device Vascular Embolization

PDI 00810170017483

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,122,869

12,771 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2025, $2,122,869 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Azur CX Detachable (Vascular Embolization).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 General $663,804 3,737
2024 General $469,563 3,148
2023 General $373,255 2,347
2022 General $397,727 2,237
2021 General $218,520 1,302

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Terumo Medical Corporation $2,121,183 12,761 payments
  2. MicroVention, Inc. $1,686 10 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2025
  1. Jessica Stewart Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Los Angeles, CA $96,549 15% · 79 payments
  2. Edward Lee Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Los Angeles, CA $75,174 11% · 87 payments
  3. Navid Eghbalieh Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Los Angeles, CA $48,080 7% · 40 payments
  4. Eric Wang Diagnostic Radiology · Charlotte, NC $21,207 3% · 11 payments
  5. Guillermo Gonzalez-Araiza Vascular & Interventional Radiology · Saint Louis, MO $20,535 3% · 12 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2025
  1. Vascular & Interventional Radiology Radiology $440,789 70% · 557 practitioners
  2. Diagnostic Radiology Radiology $87,878 14% · 280 practitioners
  3. Vascular Surgery Surgery $50,206 8% · 214 practitioners
  4. Physician Assistant $11,151 2% · 132 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $4,756 <1% · 35 practitioners

The top 5 of 61 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2025. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2025
  1. California $246,242 37% · 128 recipients
  2. North Carolina $69,770 11% · 65 recipients
  3. Texas $46,407 7% · 121 recipients
  4. Missouri $35,612 5% · 53 recipients
  5. Georgia $30,736 5% · 76 recipients

The top 5 of 51 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2025 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

12,771 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record