Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Allure Quadra RF CRT Pacemaker

Device Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$331,814

1,871 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2020, $331,814 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against Allure Quadra RF CRT Pacemaker (Cardiac Arrhythmias and Heart Failure).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $84,902 799
2019 General $246,912 1,072

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Abbott Laboratories $331,814 1,871 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. Jesse Sethi Cardiovascular Disease · Phoenix, AZ $7,252 9% · 13 payments
  2. Alexander Drtil Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Houston, TX $7,245 9% · 13 payments
  3. Ganesh Venkataraman Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Lakewood, CO $5,778 7% · 10 payments
  4. Lawrence Durban Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) · West Islip, NY $5,418 6% · 7 payments
  5. Glen Miske Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Weirton, WV $4,043 5% · 2 payments

The top 5 of the 100 largest recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $42,598 50% · 182 practitioners
  2. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $23,525 28% · 138 practitioners
  3. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $10,550 12% · 84 practitioners
  4. Thoracic Surgery (Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery) $5,510 6% · 5 practitioners
  5. Internal Medicine $1,350 2% · 19 practitioners

The top 5 of 18 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. Texas $25,477 30% · 99 recipients
  2. California $10,807 13% · 27 recipients
  3. New York $7,902 9% · 23 recipients
  4. Arizona $7,700 9% · 11 recipients
  5. Colorado $5,886 7% · 4 recipients

The top 5 of 44 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

1,871 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record