Product Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Acunav

Device Ultrasound Catheters

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,384

244 payments

Research payments

$10,000

1 payment

Through program year 2020, $8,384 in general payments and $10,000 in research payments were reported against Acunav (Ultrasound Catheters).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 General $2,162 77
2020 Research $10,000 1
2019 General $6,223 167

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Biosense Webster, Inc. $8,344 242 payments
  2. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $31 1 payment
  3. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $9 1 payment
Top recipients General payments · program year 2020
  1. Arjun Mehta Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $119 6% · 1 payment
  2. Anna Pfenniger Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Chicago, IL $119 6% · 1 payment
  3. Rachel Kaplan Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Charleston, SC $119 6% · 1 payment
  4. Jeremiah Wasserlauf Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Skokie, IL $119 6% · 1 payment
  5. Jeffrey Winterfield Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology · Charleston, SC $92 4% · 3 payments

The top 5 of 66 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2020
  1. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Internal Medicine $1,453 67% · 37 practitioners
  2. Interventional Cardiology Internal Medicine $448 21% · 16 practitioners
  3. Cardiovascular Disease Internal Medicine $240 11% · 12 practitioners
  4. Vascular & Interventional Radiology Radiology $21 <1% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2020. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2020
  1. South Carolina $639 30% · 13 recipients
  2. Illinois $514 24% · 7 recipients
  3. Arizona $230 11% · 10 recipients
  4. Georgia $157 7% · 5 recipients
  5. Colorado $108 5% · 7 recipients

The top 5 of 20 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2020 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

244 general · 1 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record