Product Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Act

Device Urological Implant

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,983

3 payments

Research payments

$174,403

12 payments

Through program year 2025, $5,983 in general payments and $174,403 in research payments were reported against Act (Urological Implant).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $121,027 6
2023 Research $11,075 2
2022 Research $18,944 2
2021 General $5,983 3
2021 Research $23,358 2

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2021
  1. Uromedica, Incorporated $5,983 3 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2021
  1. Steven Nash Kansas City, MO $5,247 88% · 2 payments
  2. Eric Rovner Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery · Charleston, SC $736 12% · 1 payment

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2021.

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2021
  1. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery Urology $736 100% · 1 practitioner

Each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2021. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

Where the money went General payments · program year 2021
  1. Missouri $5,247 88% · 1 recipient
  2. South Carolina $736 12% · 1 recipient

Each share is of general payments naming this product in 2021 where a state was reported.

3 general · 12 research

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record