Product Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

660HD Image Management System

Device Sports Med Visualization

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$39,716

59 payments

Research payments

$0

0 payments

Through program year 2019, $39,716 in general payments and $0 in research payments were reported against 660HD Image Management System (Sports Med Visualization).

No combined total These are different kinds of money, reported under different rules. A meal and a clinical trial grant do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 General $39,716 59

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $39,716 59 payments
Top recipients General payments · program year 2019
  1. James Johnson Orthopaedic Surgery · Nichols Hills, OK $22,949 58% · 16 payments
  2. Scott Trenhaile Orthopaedic Surgery · Rockford, IL $5,973 15% · 2 payments
  3. Geoffrey Van Thiel Orthopaedic Surgery · Rockford, IL $3,710 9% · 2 payments
  4. Michael Johnson Orthopaedic Surgery · Oklahoma City, OK $3,320 8% · 2 payments
  5. Ryan Nelson Orthopaedic Surgery · Oklahoma City, OK $1,669 4% · 2 payments

The top 5 of 35 recipients; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019.

The top 25 recipients, free in the app

Specialties paid General payments · program year 2019
  1. Orthopaedic Surgery $39,090 99% · 20 practitioners
  2. Sports Medicine Orthopaedic Surgery $389 <1% · 7 practitioners
  3. Foot and Ankle Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $98 <1% · 1 practitioner
  4. Hand Surgery Orthopaedic Surgery $34 <1% · 2 practitioners
  5. Surgery $22 <1% · 1 practitioner

The top 5 of 6 specialties; each share is of general payments naming this product to practitioners with a specialty in 2019. Each practitioner is counted under their primary specialty.

The top 25 specialties, free in the app

Where the money went General payments · program year 2019
  1. Oklahoma $28,888 73% · 4 recipients
  2. Illinois $9,683 24% · 2 recipients
  3. Colorado $209 <1% · 2 recipients
  4. Connecticut $197 <1% · 2 recipients
  5. New York $180 <1% · 3 recipients

The top 5 of 15 states; each share is of general payments naming this product in 2019 where a state was reported.

The top 25 states, free in the app

59 general

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Manufacturers name the drug, biological or device a payment relates to. CMS does not give products their own identifiers, so a product here is assembled from how it was reported — a brand may appear under more than one spelling, and this page covers one of them rather than the brand as a whole.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record