Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Xcancer

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$3,281,383

53 payments

Through program year 2025, Xcancer is reported as receiving $3,281,383 in research payments, across 53 payments.

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,830,283 45
2024 Research $451,100 8

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,423,129 2 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $798,364 19 payments
  3. Blue Earth Diagnostics Limited $588,361 22 payments
  4. AstraZeneca UK Limited $448,905 4 payments
  5. Telix Pharmaceuticals $17,500 5 payments
  6. Epizyme, Inc., $5,124 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. a phase I,first in human,dose escalation study of 225ac AZD2284 in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer $1,148,161 1 payment
  2. A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study of JSB462 (Luxdegalutamide) in Combination With Abiraterone in Adult Male Patients With Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) $541,588 6 payments
  3. Intrapatient Comparison of Urinary Radioactivity Following Piflufolastat (18F) and Flotufolastat (18F) PET in Men With Low PSA Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy $502,242 5 payments
  4. CAMBRIA-1 A Phase III, Open-Label,Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Extended Therapy with Camizestrant (AZD9833, a Next Generation, Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader) vs Standard Endocrine Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitor or Tamoxifen) in Patients with ER+/HER2 $318,509 3 payments
  5. PSMA-directed Targeted Alpha Therapy With FPI-2265 (225Ac-PSMA-I&T) for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-resISTant Prostate Cancer (TATCIST). A Phase II Clinical Trial $274,969 1 payment
  6. A Phase II, Open-label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Comparing the Combination of Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan (AAA617) and Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) vs. Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan (AAA617) in First-line Treatment $175,288 3 payments
  7. CAMBRIA-2 A Phase III, Open-Label, Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Camizestrant (AZD9833, a Next Generation, Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader) vs Standard Endocrine Therapy (Aromatase Inhibitor or Tamoxifen) as Adjuvant Treatment for Patients With ER+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer and an Intermediate-high or High risk of Recurrence Who Have Completed Definitive Locoregional Treatment and Have No Evidence of Disease $130,397 1 payment
  8. Intrapatient Comparison of Urinary Radioactivity Following Piflufolastat (18F) and Flotufolastat (18F) PET in Men With Low PSA Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy $86,119 17 payments
  9. An Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Study Comparing 177Lu-Psma-617 in Combination With Standard of Care, Versus Standard of Care Alone, in Adult Male Patients With Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer (Mhspc) $47,001 2 payments
  10. A Phase IV, Post-Authorization Safety Study to Investigate the Long-Term Safety of lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan in Adult Participants with Prostate Cancer $31,275 3 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record