Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Wrclinsearch LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,089,124

101 payments

Through program year 2025, Wrclinsearch LLC is reported as receiving $1,089,124 in research payments, across 101 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $14,349 2
2024 Research $67,059 10
2023 Research $542,013 32
2022 Research $278,365 25
2021 Research $25,868 8
2020 Research $24,063 6
2019 Research $137,407 18

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $1,032,680 90 payments
  2. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $55,439 9 payments
  3. Shire North American Group Inc $600 1 payment
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $406 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3 Randomized Observerblinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of A Modified Rna Vaccine Against Influenza Compared to Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults 18 Years of Age Or Older $762,358 35 payments
  2. A Phase 2 Randomized Doubleblind Doubledummy Placebocontrolled Doseranging Dosefinding Parallel Group Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Pf06865571 Dgat2i Alone and When Coadministered With Pf05221304 Acci in Adult Participants With Biopsyconfirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Fibrosis Stage 2 Or 3 $122,401 27 payments
  3. A Phase 2A Randomized Double Blind Sponsoropen Placebo Controlled Parallel Group Study to Assess the Pharmacodynamics Safety and Tolerability of Pf05221304 and Pf06865571 Coadministered for 6 Weeks in Adults With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Nafld $86,725 10 payments
  4. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK-906 in Adult Participants With Symptomatic Idiopathic or Diabetic Gastroparesis $55,439 9 payments
  5. An Interventional Phase 23 Adaptive Multicenter Randomized Doubleblind Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of Oral Sisunatovir Compared With Placebo in Nonhospitalized Symptomatic Adults With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Who Are at Risk of Progression to Severe Illness $28,950 5 payments
  6. An Interventional Efficacy and Safety Phase 3 Doubleblind 2Arm Study to Investigate Orally Administered Ibuzatrelvir Compared With Placebo in Nonhospitalized Symptomatic Adult and Adolescent Participants With Covid19 Who Are at High Risk of Progressing to Severe Illness $14,349 2 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Randomized Activecontrolled Observerblinded Trial to Assess the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Menabcwy in Healthy Participants 10 to 26 Years of Age $11,640 3 payments
  8. A Phase 3 Randomized Activecontrolled Observerblinded Trial to Assess the Safety Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Menabcwy in Healthy Participants 10 to 26 Years of Age $6,052 3 payments
  9. A Phase 2 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Shp626, An Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter Inhibitor Asbti in Adults With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Nash $600 1 payment
  10. A Phase 1/2, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Multi-Country Study to Eval $406 1 payment
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $55,439 9 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record