Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

WR CRCN LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$4,098,507

605 payments

Through program year 2025, WR CRCN LLC is reported as receiving $4,098,507 in research payments, across 605 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $134,345 48
2024 Research $1,053,378 100
2023 Research $2,365,516 424
2022 Research $303,638 7
2021 Research $45,861 10
2020 Research $195,769 16

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Moderna TX, Inc. $2,982,424 478 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $268,299 2 payments
  3. Mylan Inc. $228,256 46 payments
  4. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. $170,999 10 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $122,707 24 payments
  6. Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $98,164 18 payments
  7. Ucb SA $86,892 10 payments
  8. Sage Therapeutics, Inc. $70,748 2 payments
  9. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $48,620 8 payments
  10. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $14,150 3 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Stratified, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults Aged 18 Years and Older $2,068,637 53 payments
  2. A Randomized, Observer-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Study to Investigate the Safety, Immunogenicity, and Relative Vaccine Efficacy of mRNA-1283.222 Administered as a Booster Dose Compared With mRNA-1273.222 in Participants Aged 12 Years and Older for the Prevention of COVID-19 $326,313 240 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1647 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Vaccine in Healthy Participants 16 to 40 Years of Age $319,483 35 payments
  4. Mr-100A-01-Td-3001-A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single Arm Study of Mr-100A-01 in Women of Childbearing Potential to Evaluate Contraceptive Efficacy and Safety $228,256 46 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Observer-blind, Active-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of mRNA-1010 Candidate Seasonal Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older $205,920 124 payments
  6. Safety and Tolerability Study of Diazepam Buccal Soluble Film DBSF in Subjects With Epilepsy $170,999 10 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of V116 When Administered Concomitantly with Influenza Vaccine in Adults 50 Years of Age or Older $144,587 1 payment
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of the Concomitant Administration of Either 23-Valent Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine or 15-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine with a Booster Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine in Healthy Adults 50 Years of Age or Older. $123,712 1 payment
  9. A Phase 23 Randomized Doubleblind Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Zavegepant in Migraine Prevention $122,707 24 payments
  10. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effects of Sage-718 in Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Impairment $70,748 2 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Patient care $170,999 10 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record