Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Wolverine Clinical Trials LLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$3,557,777

188 payments

Through program year 2025, Wolverine Clinical Trials LLC is reported as receiving $3,557,777 in research payments, across 188 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $445,600 42
2024 Research $490,419 39
2023 Research $321,179 38
2022 Research $58,482 17
2021 Research $2,090,946 36
2020 Research $151,151 16

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $2,496,547 20 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $575,225 94 payments
  3. Genentech, Inc. $310,388 55 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $114,867 3 payments
  5. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $60,750 16 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ly3819253 and Ly3832479 in Participants With Mild to Moderate Covid-19 Illness $1,543,840 3 payments
  2. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mono and Combination Therapy With Monoclonal Antibodies in Participants With Mild to Moderate Covid-19 Illness (Blaze-4) $377,762 2 payments
  3. Roche Cancer Screening Collection Study $310,388 55 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Oral Orforglipron Compared With Dapagliflozin in Adult Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control With Metformin (Achieve-2) $303,005 4 payments
  5. A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblind 52Week Placebocontrolled Multicenter Study With A Doubleblind 52Week Extension Period With Randomized Dose Updose Down Titration Investigating the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of Ritlecitinib in Adult Participants With Nonsegmental Vitiligo $244,790 32 payments
  6. A Phase 3B Randomized Doubleblind Doubledummy Active Controlled Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib Compared With Dupilumab in Adult Participants on Background Topical Therapy With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis $226,139 28 payments
  7. A Phase 2B Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate Peresolimab in Adult Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis $142,758 2 payments
  8. A Phase 3 Multicenter Longterm Extension Study Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib With Or Without Topical Medications Administered to Subjects Aged 12 Years and Older With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis $79,658 29 payments
  9. A Phase 3, 52-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Rocatinlimab in Adult Subjects With Prurigo Nodularis Who Are Inadequately Controlled on Topical Therapies or Not Eligible for Topical Therapies $67,418 1 payment
  10. A Parallel-Group Treatment, Phase 2, Double-Blind Study of Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Ly3457263 Compared to Placebo in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on A Stable Dose of Tirzepatide Or Semaglutide Who Failed to Achieve Hba1c Goal $62,329 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record