Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Organisation paid for research Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Walla Walla Clinic

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$153,454

57 payments

Through program year 2021, Walla Walla Clinic is reported as receiving $153,454 in research payments, across 57 payments.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $7,083 5
2020 Research $40,925 16
2019 Research $105,446 36

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $91,320 12 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk AS $34,247 37 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $27,886 8 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Arm Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Investigational Dulaglutide Doses When Added to Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus $48,721 4 payments
  2. A Study of Tirzepatide (Ly3298176) Once A Week Versus Insulin Glargine Once A Day in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes and Increased Cardiovascular Risk $42,503 6 payments
  3. A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblind Placebocontrolled 26Week Multicenter Study With A 78Week Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ertugliflozin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin Mo $27,886 8 payments
  4. Nn2211-4232 $22,448 7 payments
  5. Nn9535-4506 $11,799 30 payments
  6. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Versus Placebo in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (Nash) $49 1 payment
  7. Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide Once Weekly in Participants Without Type 2 Diabetes Who Have Obesity Or Are Overweight With Weight- Related Comorbidities: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial (Surmount-1) $48 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record