Organisation paid for research Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Wake Forest Universityhealth Scienc Es

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$223,390

80 payments

Through program year 2022, Wake Forest Universityhealth Scienc Es is reported as receiving $223,390 in research payments, across 80 payments.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $9,164 8
2021 Research $20,759 17
2020 Research $63,709 21
2019 Research $129,758 34

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $217,190 79 payments
  2. Medical Device Business Services, Inc. $6,200 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Daratumumab, Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (D-RVd) Versus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Eligible for High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation $126,485 28 payments
  2. A Multicenter Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Combination with Standard Multiple Myeloma Treatment Regimens $41,052 15 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-controlled, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Switching to a Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Once-daily Single-tablet Regimen Versus Continuing the Current Regimen Consisting of a Boosted Protease Inhibitor Combined With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Virologically-suppressed, Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Subjects $12,340 6 payments
  4. A Multi Center Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Subcutaneous Daratumumab in Combination with Standard Multiple Myeloma Treatment Regimens $9,729 4 payments
  5. Phase 2 Randomized Open Label Study Comparing Daratumumab Lenalidomide Bortezomib and Dexamethasone DRVd Versus Lenalidomide Bortezomib and Dexamethasone RVd in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Eligible for High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation $9,164 8 payments
  6. Phase 2 Randomized Open Label Study Comparing Daratumumab Lenalidomide Bortezomib and Dexamethasone DRVd Versus Lenalidomide Bortezomib and Dexamethasone RVd in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Eligible for High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologo $7,782 8 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-controlled, Double-blind Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Once Daily Fixed Dose Combination Regimen Versus a Regimen Consisting of Darunavir/Cobicistat Fixed Dose Combination Coadministered With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Fixed Dose Combination in Antiretroviral Treatment-naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Subjects $7,390 5 payments
  8. De-identified patient-level data from periprosthetic fracture patients in which the DePuy Synthes Proximal Femur Hook Plate was utilized as part of the fracture fixation construct $6,200 1 payment
  9. Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir Cobicistat Emtricitabine Tenofovir Alafenamide DCFTAF Regimen Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor bPI Along With Emtricitabine Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate FTCTDF Regimen in Virologically Suppressed HIV1 In $2,480 3 payments
  10. A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus a Regimen Consisting of Darunavir/Cobicistat FDC With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate FDC in Tre $768 2 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record