Organisation paid for research Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

VitaLink Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$320,735

54 payments

Through program year 2024, VitaLink Research is reported as receiving $320,735 in research payments, across 54 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $10,052 1
2023 Research $79,414 11
2022 Research $21,553 4
2021 Research $97,497 7
2020 Research $104,667 9
2019 Research $7,552 22

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $114,043 10 payments
  2. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $87,761 8 payments
  3. Mylan Specialty L.P. $86,437 10 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $22,800 1 payment
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $8,012 3 payments
  6. Cipla USA Inc. $1,515 21 payments
  7. Moderna TX, Inc. $167 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group Study Comparing Improvements in Lung Function in Adults With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rate Following Once-Daily Treatment Over 12 Weeks With Either Revefenacin Inhalation Solution Delivered via Standard Jet Nebulizer or Tiotropium Delivered via a Dry Powder Inhaler (Spiriva HandiHaler) $76,385 9 payments
  2. A Multicentre Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Parallel Group Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Uncontrolled Asthma $71,712 2 payments
  3. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Ensovibep (Mp0420) in Ambulatory Adult Patients With Symptomatic Covid-19 (The Empathy Trial) $63,989 1 payment
  4. A Multicentre, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3, Safety Extension Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Tezepelumab in Adults and Adolescents with Severe Uncontrolled Asthma. $29,986 4 payments
  5. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability, Efficacy, and Immunogenicity of V591 MV SARS-CoV-2, Live, Recombinant in Healthy Individuals 16 Years of Age or Older $22,800 1 payment
  6. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Ensovibep (Mp0420) in Ambulatory Adult Patients With Symptomatic Covid-19 $14,469 1 payment
  7. A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel?Group Study Comparing Improvements in Lung Function in Adults With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rate Following Once-Daily Treatment Over 12 Weeks With Either Revefenacin Inhalation Solution Delivered via Standard Jet Nebulizer or Tiotropium Delivered via a Dry Powder Inhaler (Spiriva HandiHaler) $10,052 1 payment
  8. Tio & Olo versus PBO stratified by PIFR $8,012 3 payments
  9. A Phase II Randomized Double-blind Placebo controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of MEDI3506 in Participants with Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Bronchitis FRONTIER 4 $6,933 2 payments
  10. A 12 Week Multicenter Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Qaw039 When Added to Standard-Of-Care Asthma Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma $6,114 2 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record