Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Urology San Antonio

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$5,614,512

141 payments

Through program year 2025, Urology San Antonio is reported as receiving $5,614,512 in research payments, across 141 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $2,555,511 41
2024 Research $1,979,223 37
2023 Research $89,673 18
2022 Research $445,808 14
2021 Research $460,586 21
2020 Research $83,711 10

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $3,337,816 42 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $711,967 1 payment
  3. Blue Earth Diagnostics Limited $600,262 25 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $379,173 8 payments
  5. Provepharm Inc. $261,023 3 payments
  6. Epizyme, Inc., $125,159 24 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $114,879 5 payments
  8. Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. $30,834 2 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $21,798 10 payments
  10. AstraZeneca UK Limited $18,349 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Talapro3 A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblind Study of Talazoparib With Enzalutamide Versus Placebo With Enzalutamide in Men With DDR Gene Mutated Metastatic Castrationsensitive Prostate Cancer $3,337,187 41 payments
  2. A Randomized 2-cohort Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of AZD5305 in Combination with Physicians Choice New Hormonal Agents in Patients with HRRm and non-HRRm Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer EvoPAR-Prostate01 $711,967 1 payment
  3. A Prospective, Phase 3, Multi Center, Single-arm, Imaging Study Investigating the Safety and Diagnostic Performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) PET Ligand in Men With Suspected Prostate Cancer Recurrence Based on Elevated PSA Following Prior Therapy. $342,859 5 payments
  4. A Phase 1/2 Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Cohort Expansion Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of ARV-766 Monotherapy and in Combination With Abiraterone in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer $243,234 2 payments
  5. PVP-22IC04 and PVP-22IC05 $213,884 1 payment
  6. CELLO-1: A Phase 1b/2 Open-Label Study Evaluating Tazemetostat in Combination With Enzalutamide or Abiraterone/Prednisone in Chemotherapy Naive Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer $123,169 22 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Nivolumab or Placebo in Combination With Docetaxel, in Men With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer $114,879 5 payments
  8. Intrapatient Comparison of Urinary Radioactivity Following Piflufolastat (18F) and Flotufolastat (18F) PET in Men With Low PSA Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy $113,850 4 payments
  9. A Phase II, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study of JSB462 (Luxdegalutamide) in Combination With Abiraterone in Adult Male Patients With Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer (mHSPC) $108,353 3 payments
  10. A Prospective, Phase 3, Multi Center, Single-arm, Imaging Study Investigating the Safety and Diagnostic Performance of rhPSMA 7.3 (18F) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Ligand in Men With Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer $66,011 4 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Patient care $4,808 1 payment
  2. Overhead $4,808 1 payment

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record