Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Urology Austin PLLC

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$2,169,485

203 payments

Through program year 2025, Urology Austin PLLC is reported as receiving $2,169,485 in research payments, across 203 payments.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,029,297 107
2024 Research $873,427 64
2023 Research $36,951 8
2022 Research $43,047 14
2021 Research $162,134 9
2020 Research $24,629 1

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $1,738,890 150 payments
  2. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $197,640 24 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $164,152 6 payments
  4. Teleflex Medical Incorporated $21,973 14 payments
  5. Teleflex LLC $20,300 1 payment
  6. Arrow International, Inc. $19,540 7 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $6,990 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Canc $711,489 33 payments
  2. MoonRISe-1 - A Phase 3, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-210 Erdafitinib Intravesical Delivery System Versus Single Agent Intravesical Chemotherapy in Participants With Intermediate-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (IR-NM $372,422 28 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 Versus Investigator's Choice of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Participants Who Received Bacillus Calmette-Gurin (BCG) and Recurred with High-risk Non-musc $209,818 15 payments
  4. A Multi-Center, Prospective, Observational Study of Patients Being Treated With Orgovyx $170,089 22 payments
  5. A Phase 3 Randomized Doubleblind Placebocontrolled Study of Talazoparib With Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castrationresistant Prostate Cancer $139,524 5 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (HR-NMIBC) $94,021 9 payments
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-210 Erdafitinib Intravesical Delivery System Versus Investigator's Choice of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer with Susceptible FGFR Alterations Who Had Received Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Gurin (BCG) $73,865 1 payment
  8. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Apalutamide to Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-Risk Patients with PSMA-PET-Positive Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, with an Observational Fo $65,717 20 payments
  9. Phase 1 Study of Erdafitinib Intravesical Delivery System (TAR-210) in Participants with Non-Muscle-Invasive or Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Selected FGFR Mutations or Fusions $56,533 4 payments
  10. A Multi Center Open label Single arm Phase 2 Study of the Adjuvant Treatment of Apalutamide and Androgen Deprivation Therapy ADT in Treatment naive Participants Who Have Undergone Radical Prostatectomy RP for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer and Who Are at High Risk for Metastases $55,055 23 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record