Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Urological Research Network

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,729,735

269 payments

Through program year 2025, Urological Research Network is reported as receiving $1,729,735 in research payments, across 269 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $266,317 52
2024 Research $468,758 45
2023 Research $433,008 47
2022 Research $202,144 46
2021 Research $163,445 37
2020 Research $155,223 30
2019 Research $40,840 12

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Research & Development, LLC $880,933 243 payments
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $755,890 10 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $57,975 2 payments
  4. Urovant Sciences Inc $25,227 9 payments
  5. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $9,710 5 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Bacillus Calmette- Guerin BCG in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer HR NMIBC that is either Persistent or Recurrent Following BCG Induction or that is Na to BCG Treatment KEYNOTE-676 $431,513 6 payments
  2. A Randomized Double blind Placebo controlled Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide in Subjects with High risk Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy $320,353 112 payments
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Bacillus Calmette- Guerin BCG in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer HR NMIBC that is either Persistent or Recurrent Following BCG Induction or that is Na ve to BCG Treatment KEYNOTE-676 $229,717 2 payments
  4. A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of TAR-200 in Combination with Cetrelimab Versus Intravesical Bacillus CalmetteGurin (BCG) in Participants with BCG-nave High-Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Canc $226,925 29 payments
  5. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study of Apalutamide in Subjects with High-risk, Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Who are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy $193,044 33 payments
  6. A Phase 3, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab MK-3475 in Combination with Bacillus Calmette- Guerin BCG in Participants with High-risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer HR NMIBC that i $93,728 1 payment
  7. a phase 3b,open label,single arm,multi center,US study of bacillus calmette guerin bcg administered in combination with durvalumab in adult bcg naive,high risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer participants patapsco $57,975 2 payments
  8. A Phase 3 Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Vibegron in Men With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Symptoms on Pharmacological Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) $31,436 11 payments
  9. Phase 1 Study of Erdafitinib Intravesical Delivery System (TAR-210) in Participants with Non-Muscle-Invasive or Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Selected FGFR Mutations or Fusions $29,312 7 payments
  10. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Apalutamide to Radiotherapy and LHRH Agonist in High-Risk Patients with PSMA-PET-Positive Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer, with an Observational Fo $22,339 6 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record