Organisation paid for research Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Upstate Infectious Diseases Associates

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$24,653

25 payments

Through program year 2021, Upstate Infectious Diseases Associates is reported as receiving $24,653 in research payments, across 25 payments.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $3,198 2
2020 Research $10,046 12
2019 Research $11,409 11

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $24,653 25 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $2,433 1 payment
  2. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/TenA Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $2,282 1 payment
  3. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,676 1 payment
  4. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,646 1 payment
  5. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/TenA Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,506 1 payment
  6. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/TenA Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,374 1 payment
  7. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,365 1 payment
  8. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of GS-9883/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in HIV-1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,321 1 payment
  9. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $1,241 1 payment
  10. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Fixed Dose Combination of GS-9883/ Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Versus Dolutegravir + Emtricitabine/TenA Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV 1 Infected, Antiretroviral Treatment-Naive Adults $916 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record