Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$16,207,233

1,599 payments

Through program year 2025, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston is reported as receiving $16,207,233 in research payments, across 1,599 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,493,709 184
2024 Research $1,313,400 165
2023 Research $2,194,125 175
2022 Research $2,819,783 108
2021 Research $3,022,176 271
2020 Research $2,374,147 297
2019 Research $2,989,893 399

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $5,097,354 43 payments
  2. Akebia Therapeutics Inc $2,275,778 24 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $2,026,996 211 payments
  4. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $882,406 183 payments
  5. Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $450,844 163 payments
  6. Medtronic, Inc. $447,866 94 payments
  7. Marinus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $385,258 36 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $362,330 139 payments
  9. Incyte Corporation $323,399 29 payments
  10. PTC Therapeutics, Inc. $303,435 57 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A Prospective Phase II, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Seg101 (Crizanlizumab), in Sickle Cell Disease Patients With Priapism $1,441,568 6 payments
  2. Vadadustat for the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) $1,323,109 19 payments
  3. A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Crizanlizumab Versus Placebo, With Or Without Hydroxyurea /Hydroxycarbamide Therapy, in Adolescent and Adult Sickle Cell Disease Patients With Vaso-Occlusive Crises $1,004,050 3 payments
  4. A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Two Doses of Crizanlizumab Versus Placebo, With Or Without Hydroxyurea /Hydroxycarbamide Therapy, in Adolescent and Adult Sickle Cell Disease Pat $831,071 3 payments
  5. M15-566 $689,847 26 payments
  6. Vadadustat for the prevention and treatment ARDS due to suspected aspiration, pathogen-associated pneumonia, or sepsis $600,000 2 payments
  7. A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Two Doses of Cnp520 in Participants at Risk for the Onset of Clinical Symptoms of Ad $591,986 1 payment
  8. Slate $399,594 46 payments
  9. Vadadustat for the Prevention and Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Ards) in Hospitlized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) $352,670 3 payments
  10. A Phase 3, Open-label Study of Adjunctive Ganaxolone (GNX) Treatment in Children and Adults With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC)-Related Epilepsy (TrustTSC OLE) $337,639 24 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $278,147 3 payments
  2. Patient care $265,687 4 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record