Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

University of Miami

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$135,102,054

10,822 payments

Through program year 2025, University of Miami is reported as receiving $135,102,054 in research payments, across 10,822 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $30,838,524 1,866
2024 Research $22,179,226 1,330
2023 Research $13,726,104 1,309
2022 Research $16,285,520 1,340
2021 Research $20,196,157 1,870
2020 Research $18,476,589 1,755
2019 Research $13,399,934 1,352

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $18,673,625 544 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $14,574,609 23 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $9,219,593 525 payments
  4. Biogen, Inc. $8,035,283 44 payments
  5. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $7,818,241 76 payments
  6. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $5,267,829 104 payments
  7. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $4,460,926 481 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $4,082,801 286 payments
  9. Deciphera Pharmaceuticals Inc. $3,927,777 569 payments
  10. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,740,630 316 payments
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000220780 $15,856,227 1 payment
  2. A Open-Label Randomized Study of Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone vs Standard of Care to Determine MRD Negativity in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma ADVANCE $7,591,173 2 payments
  3. A Open-Label Randomized Study of Daratumumab, Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone vs Standard of Care to Determine MRD Negativity in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (ADVANCE) $6,772,150 5 payments
  4. A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Tofersen in Adults with a Confirmed Mutation in the Superoxide Dismutase 1 Mutation Gene Who Are Clinically Presymptomatic for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis with a Longitudinal Natural History Run-in and Open-Label Extension $3,816,429 5 payments
  5. Ribociclib Standard Endocrine Therapy in Patients With HR Her2 Early BC at High Amp Intermediate Risk for Recurrence $3,375,314 13 payments
  6. A Phase 1B2 Open Label Umbrella Study of Elranatamab Pf06863135 A Bcell Maturation Antigen Bcma Cd3 Bispecific Antibody in Combination With Other Anticancer Treatments in Participants With Multiple Myeloma $2,514,479 89 payments
  7. Phase 1/2 Fih Study of Regn5458 (Anti-Bcma X Anti-Cd3 Bispecific Antibody) in Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Multiple Myeloma $2,380,986 64 payments
  8. Phase 1 Astrocytoma study which is a study looking at the combination of Vorasidenib and Pembrolizumab $2,347,168 197 payments
  9. An Open Label Single Arm Multi Center Extension Study Evaluating Long Term Safety Tolerability and Effectiveness of Ofatumumab in Subjects With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis $1,755,265 3 payments
  10. A Master Protocol for the Multi-Cohort, Phase 1/2 Study of Dcc-3116 in Combination With Anticancer Therapies in Participants With Advanced Malignancies $1,489,489 78 payments
What the money was spent on Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Other $868,707 192 payments
  2. Patient care $423,280 44 payments
  3. Overhead $12,231 1 payment
  4. Non-patient care $7,381 2 payments

Only reported on some payments, and a payment can report more than one category, so these amounts overlap.

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record