Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute Inc.

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$2,565,686

778 payments

Through program year 2025, University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute Inc. is reported as receiving $2,565,686 in research payments, across 778 payments.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $518,525 103
2024 Research $1,073,410 276
2023 Research $586,852 250
2022 Research $354,658 137
2021 Research $32,241 12

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Insmed, Inc. $1,254,778 633 payments
  2. Kite Pharma, Inc. $665,184 122 payments
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $608,654 10 payments
  4. EMD Serono, Inc. $32,241 12 payments
  5. Amgen Inc. $4,829 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Active Comparator, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of an Amikacin Liposome Inhalation Suspension (ALIS)-Based Regimen in Adult Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Nontuberculous Mycobact $784,768 350 payments
  2. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Active Comparator, Multicenter Study to Validate Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Adult Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) Lung Infection Caused by Mycobacterium Avium Complex (ARISE) $277,092 122 payments
  3. A Phase II Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab govitecan in Patients with Previously Treated Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma $212,000 1 payment
  4. A Phase II Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab govitecan in Patients with Previously Treated Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma $212,000 1 payment
  5. A Phase II Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab govitecan in Patients with Previously Treated Locally Advanced, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma $171,614 1 payment
  6. A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Brensocatib Administered Once Daily for 52 Weeks in Subjects With Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis - The ASPEN Study $110,469 131 payments
  7. A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma $65,494 1 payment
  8. A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma $53,967 1 payment
  9. A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (ZUMA 7) $46,115 1 payment
  10. A Phase 3 Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma $31,928 1 payment

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record