Organisation paid for research Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

TTS Research

Neither a doctor nor a teaching hospital

Research payments

$1,190,924

119 payments

Through program year 2025, TTS Research is reported as receiving $1,190,924 in research payments, across 119 payments.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $79,249 3
2024 Research $58,932 3
2023 Research $5,529 4
2022 Research $60,256 6
2021 Research $428,781 11
2020 Research $198,217 15
2019 Research $359,960 77

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $779,969 18 payments
  2. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $153,198 21 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $135,512 3 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $108,901 9 payments
  5. ALK-Abello, Inc $8,743 65 payments
  6. Cipla USA Inc. $2,600 2 payments
  7. Chiesi USA, Inc. $2,000 1 payment
Studies the money was for Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. A 12-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Arm, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Csj117, When Added to Existing Asthma Therapy in Patients ? 18 Years of Age With Severe Uncontrolled Asthma. $526,998 5 payments
  2. A 52 Week Multicenter Randomized Double Blind Double Dummy Parallel Group Placebo Controlled Study of Fevipiprant Once Daily Plus Standard of Care Soc for Reduction of Systemic Corticosteroids Oral and Parenteral Use in Patients With Severe Asthma $155,376 2 payments
  3. A Randomized, Blinded, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose, Multicenter Study to Compare the Therapeutic Equivalence of Fluticasone Propionate Pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler, 110 mcg, to Flovent HFA 110 mcg, in Adult Subjects With Asthma $153,198 21 payments
  4. A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose Ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Rocatinlimab in Adult Subjects With Moderate-to-severe Asthma $76,649 1 payment
  5. A Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-3641, a Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet, in Children With a History of Ragweed-Induced Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma $66,749 4 payments
  6. STARLIGHT P2 LCM Asthma $58,862 2 payments
  7. A 12 Week Multicenter Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Qaw039 When Added to Standard-Of-Care Asthma Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Asthma $36,037 2 payments
  8. A 52 Week Multicenter Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Qaw039 When Added to Existing Asthma Therapy in Patients With Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma $34,012 3 payments
  9. A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-4482 for the Prevention of COVID-19 Laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Symptoms in Adults Residing With a Person With COVID-19 $31,652 4 payments
  10. A Multi-Center, Proof-Of-Mechanism Study of Multiple, Oral Doses of Fevipiprant (Qaw039) in COPD Patients With Sputum Eosinophilia $13,571 2 payments

What you are looking at

A noncovered recipient is an organisation paid for research that is neither an individual clinician nor a teaching hospital — typically a contract research organisation, a foundation or a trial site network. They receive 81% of all reported research money, which is why they appear here at all.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record